Americans must rise up and protest our corrupt government

July 82010

Q. How stupid are american voters?

A. Bush was re-elected.

Guess that answers that.

The Anti-Incumbency Movement is Dead

Joel S. Hirschhorn
The Intelligence Daily
November 10, 2008

In the larger picture, the anti-incumbency movement merely serves as a distraction from more sensible approaches for reforming and revitalizing American democracy. It is just another of a seemingly endless array of ineffective and marginalized political reform movements. Until American patriots and dissidents unite behind something a lot more powerful the two-party plutocracy will remain in power.

The core problem is that the public has been thoroughly brainwashed to believe in the two-party system. One major consequence is that they refuse to vote for third-party candidates, so that even when they see what is tragic about our politicians they think the solution as voting for a challenger from the other major party. This happens despite the high fraction of voters registered as independents.
The anti-incumbency movement could only be successful if it was truly bipartisan so that voters rejected not only ALL incumbent Democrats and Republicans, but also refused to elect new members to Congress from BOTH major parties. Merely shifting control of Congress from one of the major parties to the other has never worked effectively. Why? Simple, both major parties have been corrupted by the same corporate and other special interests that pervert public policies to serve them rather than the general public.
The problem is that we still do not effective political competition in a nation that prides itself about competition. The two-party duopoly and plutocracy has worked hard to block true political competition. When it comes to congressional elections, gerrymandering has been used as a potent weapon. Gerrymandering of districts by both major parties when they have the power to accomplish it has not only protected incumbents, it has also made it nearly impossible for third party congressional candidates that are on a huge number of ballots to be successful.

Nelson Lee Walker of Tenure Corrupts recently made these sage observations: Im coming around to the idea that the bulk of the American people are basically stupid, stupid, stupid! Why? How else can we explain how Congress, which has a 9% approval rating, gets reelected about 95% of the time? Do we ever throw the bums out? Listen to these stats: Senate: As of 2008, of 100 Senators, 39 (39%) reelected for 18 yrs or more, 4 over 40 years! House: As of 2008, of 435 members, 143 (33%) reelected for 14 yrs or more, 5 over 36 years! And the longer these guys are in office, the more of them will run unopposed in future elections, since nobody will bother to challenge them. Unopposed races have doubled in the last 20 years, from 40 to 80 seats. And who is responsible for this sad state of affairs? YOU!!! Not your dumb neighbor. Not the media. Not the crooked political system. Just YOU, the typical stupid American! The guy who complains how those crooked politicians are ripping off the country and sending us all down the tubes, and then reelects them!

In this of all years these critical views are hard to dispute. After all, could it be any clearer that the anti-incumbency movement is a failure? I urge those who have put so much time and energy into the anti-incumbency movement to call it quits and devote themselves to strategies that may be more effective. One option is to work hard to form a new national third party. Another is to support the relatively new nonpartisan attempt by Friends of the Article V Convention at www.foavc.org to compel Congress to give Americans what they have a constitutional right to have and what has been requested by the required number of states, and what the Founders believed we would need when the public lost trust and confidence in the federal government: an Article V convention that could consider proposals for constitutional amendments, a number of which could truly reform the structure of our dysfunctional political system.

For too long Congress has refused to obey the Constitution and we dumb Americans have let them get away with it, in large part because both Democrats and Republicans have feared (and instilled fear about) such a convention. The same people that keep getting elected to Congress! Hows that for symmetrical infamy ?
***For those of you wondering why Bush was so helpful with the transition period, this is why(b/c- Whistleblower: Bush’s NSA spied on EVERYONE) . You don’t off the next president when you’ve got a closet that, in narnia-like fasion, opens out into a crypt full of skeletons

Duration : 0:5:15

Read the rest of this entry »

Canadian WWI Internment plaque unveiling: Beauport Armoury

June 302010

A short video documenting the first of two plaque unveilings that took place on September 30, 2006 at Beauport Armoury and Val Cartier both near Quebec City, Canada.

The plaques are commemorating two of the 24 WWI internment camps across Canada that held of 8000 Eastern Europeans, 5000 of whom were Ukrainian. The Ukrainians were targeted because the area that they came from was part of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire, with which Canada and its allies were at war. The Canadian government took advantage of the situation and used the internees as cheap labour to do public works. This was Canada’s first internment operation and application of the War Measures act. It continued from 1914-1920, some internees being held even after the war ended. This episode of Canadian history is little known. Inky Mark, MP, the Ukrainian Canadian Congress, the Ukrainian Canadian Foundation of Taras Shevchenko, the Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association, and many other volunteers across Canada worked for years to have the government recognize this injustice. Inky Mark introduced Bill C-331 (Ukrainian Canadian Restitution Act) and was accepted in 2005. (see links http://www.infoukes.com/history/internment/bill_c-331/)

The following people are seen in the video: Dr. LUBOMYR LUCIUK (Director of Research, Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association), KIM PAWLIW reading poem (Grand-daughter of internee), ANNE SADELAIN unveiling plaque (Daughter of internee), Priests from the Ukrainian Catholic REV. OLEH KORETSKY and Ukrainian Orthodox REV. Dr. IHOR KUTASH churches bless the plaque, and NANCY LYZANIWSKI presents remarks.

For information on the internment: For information
on the internment: http://www.uccla.ca/internment.htm | http://www.infoukes.com/history/internment/ | http://www.quebec-ukraine.com/lib/quebec/maltraites_1.html | http://www.quebec-ukraine.com/news/ev/2006_internement_memory.html

Duration : 0:6:26

Read the rest of this entry »

The Police State – NSPD 51 / HS 20 Bush, The Dictator (p. 2)

June 302010

The signing of this Directive was generally not covered by the mainstream U.S. media or discussed by the U.S. Congress. While similar executive security directives have been issued by previous presidents, their texts have been kept secret; this is the first to be made public in part. It is unclear how the National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive will reconcile with the National Emergencies Act, a U.S. federal law passed in 1976, which gives Congress oversight over presidential emergency powers during such emergencies. The National Emergencies Act is not mentioned in the text of the National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive.

After receiving concerned communications from constituents, in July 2007 U.S. Representative and Homeland Security Committee member Peter DeFazio made an official request to examine the classified Continuity Annexes described above in a secure “bubbleroom” in the United States Capitol, but his request was denied by the White House, which cited “national security concerns

This was the first time DeFazio has been denied access to documents. He was quoted as saying, “We’re talking about the continuity of the government of the United States of America…I would think that would be relevant to any member of Congress, let alone a member of the Homeland Security Committee.”

After this denial, DeFazio joined with two colleagues (Bennie Thompson, chairman of the committee; and Chris Carney, chairman of the Homeland Security oversight subcommittee) in a renewed effort to gain access to the documents.

Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSPD_51

Duration : 0:7:45

Read the rest of this entry »

Peace Groups Challenge Congress to End the War

June 112010

On Sept. 5, 2007, at noon, on the West side of the U.S. Capitol, representatives of various Peace Groups challenged the U.S. Congress to end the Iraq War. The activists held a public signing of letters seeking a meeting, and a dialogue, with Congressional leaders. The Peace Groups want Congress “to cut off funding for the war in Iraq and to safely and swiftly bring the U.S. troops home.”

The National Campaign for Nonviolent Resistance (NCNR) coordinated today’s event. Participating were activists from Code Pink, Declaration of Peace, Democracy Rising, Dorothy Day Catholic Worker, Gold Star Families for Peace, Jonah House, Peace Action, Veterans for Peace, Voices for Creative Nonviolence, Voters for Peace and the Washington Peace Center. Check out the Declaration of Peace’s web site at: http://declarationofpeace.org/ for information on the “9 Point Comprehensive Peace Plan for Iraq,” which is referenced in the letters to the Congressional leadership.

Text-Letter to Members of Congress
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, 235 Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Sen. Harry Reid, 528 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 Rep. John Boehner, 1011 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Sen. Mitch McConnell, 361-A Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator or Representative:

As representatives of peace and justice organizations, we are writing to request a meeting with you as soon as possible at your convenience to discuss a most urgent issue. We are facing one of the greatest crisis of our times–the unmitigated disaster caused by the war and occupation of Iraq. The untold suffering in Iraq, in that region and here in the United States will be with us for decades to come. The healing of Iraq cannot begin until all occupation forces leave the country.

Many of our elected representatives express concern for the troops in Iraq. However, under a false premise, they vote to fund the war in order to “support the troops.” In reality, not much of the funding of the war actually went to the troops or the many veterans who returned home broken and damaged by what they experienced in this illegal war. Instead funding the war meant more money for profiteers like Halliburton and corrupt Iraqi officials. And funding the war inevitably led to more dead and wounded U.S. soldiers.

We urge you to be a leader in ending this dishonorable war. The continuation of this illegal and futile occupation is a refusal to accept the November 2006 mandate of the people to end this war. As you are aware, an astonishing $12 billion is wasted each month on the war in Iraq. The money going down the rabbit hole in Iraq is funding denied to the poor and the working middle class. Money for war is money denied to children, many of whom have no access to health care. Money for war is money denied to our struggling public schools. Money for war is money denied to desperately needed social services.

All of us, both legislator and peace activist, must act to end this ignoble crisis. Let us meet to discuss how best to end the occupation of Iraq as soon as possible.

The Declaration of Peace has developed a framework for a 9-point Comprehensive Peace Plan for Iraq, which we would like to discuss with you at the meeting:

1] An end to all funding for U.S. military operations in Iraq.
2] Safe and rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops and coalition forces from Iraq, with no future deployments.
3] No permanent U.S. military bases or installations in Iraq.
4] Support for an Iraqi-led peace process, including a peace conference to shape a post-occupation transition.
5] Return control of Iraqi oil and sovereignty in their economic and political affairs to the people of Iraq.
6] Support for reparations and reconstruction to address the destruction caused by the U.S. invasion, military occupation, and 13 years of economic sanctions.
7] Establish a U.S. “peace dividend” for job creation, health care, education, housing, and other social needs at home.
8] Increased support for U.S. veterans of the Iraq war.
9] No war against Iran or any other nation.

The peace community warned the government not to invade Iraq. The peace community argued that the reasons for going to war were lies. The peace community predicted that the invasion and occupation of Iraq would become a quagmire. Following the current path will only mean more death and destruction.

So representatives of various peace groups hope to speak with you, and through dialogue let us find a solution to the crisis. Please contact us and let us know when you are available to meet. We look forward to your response.

In peace,

Max Obuszewski
on behalf of the National Campaign for Nonviolent Resistance

Duration : 0:8:20

Read the rest of this entry »

Salt of the Earth (Part 3)

May 212010

“Salt of the Earth” was produced, written and directed by victims of the Hollywood blacklist. Unable to make films in Hollywood, they looked for worthy social issues to put on screen independently. This film never would have been made in Hollywood at the time, so it is ironic that it was the anti-communist backlash that brought about the conditions for it to be made. In many ways it was a film ahead of its time. Mainstream culture did not pick up on its civil rights and feminist themes for at least a decade.

“Salt of the Earth” tells the tale of a real life strike by Mexican-American miners. The story is set in a remote New Mexico town where the workers live in a company town, in company-owned shacks without basic plumbing. Put at risk by cost cutting bosses, the miners strike for safe working conditions. As the strike progresses, the issues at stake grow, driven by the workers’ wives. At first the wives are patronized by the traditional patriarchal culture. However, they assert themselves as equals and an integral part of the struggle, calling for improved sanitation and dignified treatment. Ultimately, when the bosses win a court order against the workers preventing them from demonstrating, gender roles reverse with the wives taking over the picket line and preventing scab workers from being brought in while the husbands stay at home and take care of house and children.

This film was selected for the National Film Registry in 1992 by the Library of Congress. It became public domain after its copyright was not renewed in 1982.

For more about “Salt of the Earth,” visit its IMDB page @ http://imdb.com/title/tt0047443/

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Part 6:

Part 7:

Part 8:

Part 9:

Part 10:

DOWNLOAD A QUICKTIME FILE OF THE FILM IN ITS ENTIRETY @ http://www.archive.org/details/salt_of_the_earth

Duration : 0:9:17

Read the rest of this entry »

Salt of the Earth (Part 2)

May 162010

“Salt of the Earth” was produced, written and directed by victims of the Hollywood blacklist. Unable to make films in Hollywood, they looked for worthy social issues to put on screen independently. This film never would have been made in Hollywood at the time, so it is ironic that it was the anti-communist backlash that brought about the conditions for it to be made. In many ways it was a film ahead of its time. Mainstream culture did not pick up on its civil rights and feminist themes for at least a decade.

“Salt of the Earth” tells the tale of a real life strike by Mexican-American miners. The story is set in a remote New Mexico town where the workers live in a company town, in company-owned shacks without basic plumbing. Put at risk by cost cutting bosses, the miners strike for safe working conditions. As the strike progresses, the issues at stake grow, driven by the workers’ wives. At first the wives are patronized by the traditional patriarchal culture. However, they assert themselves as equals and an integral part of the struggle, calling for improved sanitation and dignified treatment. Ultimately, when the bosses win a court order against the workers preventing them from demonstrating, gender roles reverse with the wives taking over the picket line and preventing scab workers from being brought in while the husbands stay at home and take care of house and children.

This film was selected for the National Film Registry in 1992 by the Library of Congress. It became public domain after its copyright was not renewed in 1982.

For more about “Salt of the Earth,” visit its IMDB page @ http://imdb.com/title/tt0047443/

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Part 6:

Part 7:

Part 8:

Part 9:

Part 10:

DOWNLOAD A QUICKTIME FILE OF THE FILM IN ITS ENTIRETY @ http://www.archive.org/details/salt_of_the_earth

Duration : 0:10:0

Read the rest of this entry »

Salt of the Earth (Part 1)

May 42010

“Salt of the Earth” was produced, written and directed by victims of the Hollywood blacklist. Unable to make films in Hollywood, they looked for worthy social issues to put on screen independently. This film never would have been made in Hollywood at the time, so it is ironic that it was the anti-communist backlash that brought about the conditions for it to be made. In many ways it was a film ahead of its time. Mainstream culture did not pick up on its civil rights and feminist themes for at least a decade.

“Salt of the Earth” tells the tale of a real life strike by Mexican-American miners. The story is set in a remote New Mexico town where the workers live in a company town, in company-owned shacks without basic plumbing. Put at risk by cost cutting bosses, the miners strike for safe working conditions. As the strike progresses, the issues at stake grow, driven by the workers’ wives. At first the wives are patronized by the traditional patriarchal culture. However, they assert themselves as equals and an integral part of the struggle, calling for improved sanitation and dignified treatment. Ultimately, when the bosses win a court order against the workers preventing them from demonstrating, gender roles reverse with the wives taking over the picket line and preventing scab workers from being brought in while the husbands stay at home and take care of house and children.

This film was selected for the National Film Registry in 1992 by the Library of Congress. It became public domain after its copyright was not renewed in 1982.

For more about “Salt of the Earth,” visit its IMDB page @ http://imdb.com/title/tt0047443/

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Part 6:

Part 7:

Part 8:

Part 9:

Part 10:

DOWNLOAD A QUICKTIME FILE OF THE FILM IN ITS ENTIRETY @ http://www.archive.org/details/salt_of_the_earth

Duration : 0:9:26

Read the rest of this entry »

GOP Congressmen Admit Most Republicans Think Iraq War Was a Mistake

April 132010

In a panel at the Cato Institute on conservatism and war, U.S. Reps. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.) Tom McClintock (R-Calif.) and John Duncan (R-Tenn.) revealed that the vast majority of GOP members of Congress now think it was wrong for the U.S. to invade Iraq in 2003.

Duration : 0:3:29

Read the rest of this entry »

In Full: State of the Union

April 132010

IN FULL: President Obama spoke before Congress in his first State of the Union address.

Duration : 1:9:20

Read the rest of this entry »

Copenhagen; Global Climate Change Scam For Global Taxes

April 102010

http://RevolutionNews.us — December 2009 — Deliberately timed to coincide with the start of the United Nations climate conference in Copenhagen, the Environmental Protection Agency on Monday declared that carbon dioxide, a naturally occurring gas thats essential to life on Earth, poses a threat to human health and welfare. This determination clears the way for the federal government to begin restricting energy production and restructuring the entire American economy.

The EPA cited a 2007 Supreme Court ruling declaring that carbon dioxide is a pollutant, subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act, but the science upon which that ruling was based has now been called into question when emails and internal documents between the UNs leading climate change scientists were leaked to the public. Contained with in the files was evidence of suppression, manipulation and destruction of climate data. The emails revealed that the entire historical climate record that is the basis for all determinations of climate change is based on inaccurate data and has been manipulated to match a political and economic agenda.

If the EPA acts unilaterally to restrict carbon dioxide emissions, the impact on the economy could be even worse than a cap and trade law enacted by Congress. The reasons for this move by the Obama Administrations EPA appear to be two-fold: First, to establish authority for President Obama to make enforceable agreements at the UNs climate conference even in lieu of a treaty or Congressional approval; and Second to give the administration leverage to coerce the Senate into enacting a cap and trade law just to lessen the economic damage that could be wrought by the EPAs heavy-handed restrictions of CO2.

At this moment, our national economy is under threat by carbon regulation schemes on three fronts: The Copenhagen conference designed to create a world carbon regulatory authority which could undermine our sovereignty; The cap and trade bill thats been passed by the House of Representatives and now awaits Senate approval; and the Obama Administrations decision that it can regulate carbon dioxide via the EPA even without approval by Congress.

For a preview of what this could mean to American families, one can look to Germany, where due to restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions, electricity costs three-times more than in the US and gasoline is now $8.00 per gallon.

You must make your voice heard loud and clear right now. This is no longer a far-away possibility. Its happening as you read this. Times up.

Take Action: If you dont think its a good idea to dramatically slash domestic energy production at a cost of trillions of dollars and untold American jobs over the politics of a discredited climate scare, pick up your phone and call the White House right now. Tell the Obama Administration you wont stand for this unparalleled fleecing of the American public. Call (202) 456-1111 to be heard today.

http://www.globalclimatescam.com

♥☠✿☮❀☠✿☮❀☠✿♥❀☠✿

http://RevolutionNews.us

♥☠✿☮❀☠✿☮❀☠✿♥❀☠✿

The Haight-Ashbury Homepage

http://www.LoveHaight.org

♥☠✿☮❀☠✿☮❀☠✿♥❀☠✿

Duration : 0:11:0

Read the rest of this entry »